我在介绍各种内在过程的文档里不断看到这种记号 (https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22(3f)%22+fortran&t=ffab&atb=v345-1&ia=web)。
tostring(3f)
reshape(3f)
huge(3f)
但一直没找到 (3f) 的含义说明。
我在介绍各种内在过程的文档里不断看到这种记号 (https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22(3f)%22+fortran&t=ffab&atb=v345-1&ia=web)。
tostring(3f)
reshape(3f)
huge(3f)
但一直没找到 (3f) 的含义说明。
I keep seeing this particular notation throughout documentation that discusses the various intrinsic procedures (https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22(3f)%22+fortran&t=ffab&atb=v345-1&ia=web):
tostring(3f)
reshape(3f)
huge(3f)
Yet I haven't managed to locate an explanation for (3f).
我猜你指的是 Fortran-Lang 的内在过程页面,Fortran 内在过程介绍 (https://fortran-lang.org/en/learn/intrinsics/index.html#)
据我理解,这是查找 man 手册页的约定 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_page)(“Command Usage” 一节有完整解释)。
I suspect you mean the Fortran-Lang page of intrinsics: Fortran Intrinsics — Fortran Programming Language (https://fortran-lang.org/en/learn/intrinsics/index.html#)
As I understand it, this follows the man-page lookup convention (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_page) (the “Command Usage” section has a complete explanation).
如果没有编译好的 unix 风格 Fortran 手册页,这个记号并没有什么用。对我来说它只是干扰,我希望 fortran-lang 的教程和文档能去掉它。
Without compiled unix-style Fortran man pages, it doesn't convey anything useful. Personally, I find it clutter and would prefer fortran-lang's tutorials and documentation to leave it out.
对我来说它只是干扰,我希望 fortran-lang 的教程和文档能去掉它。
我完全赞同。
我猜这些“man 手册页”标签来自 @reedcanopy,这位参与者似乎根本分不清哪里该加、哪里不该加!
大约在 2016-19 年,Fortran Discourse 出现之前,@reedcanopy 在 comp.lang.fortran 上的帖子里就有这些标签,尤其爱用 (3f),读者看了也不知道有什么关系。要知道,那可是个纯文本论坛!
Personally, I find it clutter and would prefer fortran-lang's tutorials and documentation to leave it out.
I'm entirely in agreement.
My guess is that these “man page” tags come from @reedcanopy, who simply can't tell where they belong and where they don't!
Around 2016-19, before Fortran Discourse, @reedcanopy's comp.lang.fortran messages - remember, that forum was entirely text - contained these tags, particularly (3f), leaving readers puzzled about what they were relevant to!
这话似乎有点不公平。据我记得,那位参与者自己做的工具确实会用到 man 手册页的命名约定。(3f) 之类的标签出现在 fortran-lang 资料里,只是 @reedcanopy 贡献很多带来的结果。把它们删掉再提交一个 PR,应该也不算太麻烦。
That strikes me as somewhat unfair. As I recall, their own tools actually use the man-page naming convention. These (3f) labels and similar ones reach fortran-lang's material as a side effect of @reedcanopy contributing so much. Removing them and submitting a PR doesn't sound especially burdensome.
能在 Google Colab (云端的 Jupyter) 中使用 MATLAB 命令吗? 例如,我想在 Google Colab 中调用 Risk Management Toolbox 的函数,比如 bin(vbt, Name, Value)、tb…
我的尝试如下。 不过,看起来并不存在这条命令。 gdb 能实现这样的功能吗?
我想验证文本中包含 one 或 two。 在 Playwright 中能这样实现吗? 同样的写法也能用在句子内部吗,比如下面这样